Hi, it's an old car racing game. Baisiclly used for multiplayer. Action takes place in some sort of desert with hills and so on, and the cars are like buggy,trucks and so on (not like racing porche, ferrari and etc.). There is no specific track it's just a big area and the point is to collect flags that randomly appares in different location of the map. Whomever collects most - wins. Does anybody know this game and could provide a name of this game? Thankyou.Help to remember the name of the game
1nsane Racing?http://www.gamespot.com/pc/driving/1nsane/index.html or maybeBig Red Racing? http://www.gamespot.com/pc/driving/bigredracing/index.htmlHelp to remember the name of the game
Yes, 1nsane racing . Thankyou very much!!!
Glad I could help :DOne of my favorite games btw...with a nice wheel/pedals it's really fun...even just tooling around the maps doing nothing more then climbing up hills and stuff.
[QUOTE=''dnuggs40'']One of my favorite games btw...with a nice wheel/pedals it's really fun...even just tooling around the maps doing nothing more then climbing up hills and stuff. [/QUOTE]I agree :D Haven't played it in a while, and I'm not sure how well it's aged, but I absolutely had tons of fun with this game! fyi - it's available for purchase at gog.com
Actually it aged pretty well. I think I played it (reinstalled) about a year ago and it was still great. While the graphics aren't so hot, the gameplay is still nice. Decent physics, in car cams, good sfx, nice gameplay modes...it's still good.Actually talking about it makes me want to reinstall it again...I wonder if it supports wide screens (I have a LCD now).
Thursday, April 15, 2010
What are some good crysis mods out there?
anyone know any?What are some good crysis mods out there?
I've see come pretty cool ones out there. The Physics III mod is pretty sweet. It has 3 small islands with all different things setup and you can toy with the physics engine. Check out www.crymod.com and enjoy. :)What are some good crysis mods out there?
[QUOTE=''XRED_0'']I've see come pretty cool ones out there. The Physics III mod is pretty sweet. It has 3 small islands with all different things setup and you can toy with the physics engine. Check out www.crymod.com and enjoy. :)[/QUOTE]
thanks
download the resort map
[QUOTE=''Hellboard'']download the resort map[/QUOTE]
thanks for the suggestion. but what is it?
Look around Moddb.com %26 Crymod.com for some good mods/maps.;)Here's a good map I highly recommend. Vulcano.-A few Crysis mods to keep an eye on.;)MechWarrior: Living Legends.Lost World Returns.-
The best mods I've found to be graphical mods, such as Realistic mods and ultra-res texture mods. Haven't seen too many good gameplay mods though.
[QUOTE=''REforever101''][QUOTE=''Hellboard'']download the resort map[/QUOTE]
thanks for the suggestion. but what is it?[/QUOTE]
a freaking awesome map!
I've see come pretty cool ones out there. The Physics III mod is pretty sweet. It has 3 small islands with all different things setup and you can toy with the physics engine. Check out www.crymod.com and enjoy. :)What are some good crysis mods out there?
[QUOTE=''XRED_0'']I've see come pretty cool ones out there. The Physics III mod is pretty sweet. It has 3 small islands with all different things setup and you can toy with the physics engine. Check out www.crymod.com and enjoy. :)[/QUOTE]
thanks
download the resort map
[QUOTE=''Hellboard'']download the resort map[/QUOTE]
thanks for the suggestion. but what is it?
Look around Moddb.com %26 Crymod.com for some good mods/maps.;)Here's a good map I highly recommend. Vulcano.-A few Crysis mods to keep an eye on.;)MechWarrior: Living Legends.Lost World Returns.-
The best mods I've found to be graphical mods, such as Realistic mods and ultra-res texture mods. Haven't seen too many good gameplay mods though.
[QUOTE=''REforever101''][QUOTE=''Hellboard'']download the resort map[/QUOTE]
thanks for the suggestion. but what is it?[/QUOTE]
a freaking awesome map!
Mass Effect Questions
Thinking of getting Mass Effect (ME) on steam but have a few questions just to make sure I will like it. I don't mind very heavy story driven RPG's but honestly I am just in the mood for some arpg type action (like diablo, ect). 1) Is there lots of meaningfull ways to customize your character with skills that have real gameplay changing effects? 2) Is there an item system where you can find special items or different levels of quality?3) I hear it's very story driven...is it still enjoyable if you play for the level up/looting/character progressing aspect of the game?4) Is it a good port? Runs well ect? It's not that I have anything against story heavy RPG's...just not in the mood lately for them. It's either ME or Bioshock for $5 on steam, although I am not interested in Bioshock so much as I am completely burned out on FPS type games. If you have any other ideas let me know...even if it's an indie game or something.Thanks Mass Effect Questions
1. yes definitely
2. don't really remember maybe someone else can fill in this gap
3. yes although they don't give you tons of opportunities to level up beyond the missions. Its pretty linear really. Not like diablo at all.
4. Excellent. very few problems for this day in age. It is stable for sure.
$5 is a great price. I was going to recommend Fallout 3 until I saw your price. Bioshock is much the same as Masseffect. Pretty linear and not much opportunity to power level. Both are more about the story. Mass Effect is probably closer but neither is like diablo. Hard to think of another $5 game. Might look at Mount and Blade. Its not a graphical wonder but its cheap, and totally a power leveling action rpg. Fallout 3 if you have more money would be good as well. There are also a lot of cheap diablo clones such as Dungeon Lords. Mass Effect Questions
I thought of a couple more recommendations that are better. You might look at the witcher, neverwinter nights, or titan quest for cheaper action rpgs like diablo.
Mass effect is very cinematic,feels like a movie sometimes,but its a crap crap crap game.Choices dont mean much..most of the planet surfaces are copy and paste jobs that would take no time at all to make...the story is mediocre...having sex with a blue aliens is always a plus though i guess...
[QUOTE=''dnuggs40'']Thinking of getting Mass Effect (ME) on steam but have a few questions just to make sure I will like it. I don't mind very heavy story driven RPG's but honestly I am just in the mood for some arpg type action (like diablo, ect). 1) Is there lots of meaningfull ways to customize your character with skills that have real gameplay changing effects? Other than the different cla$ses, nope. 2) Is there an item system where you can find special items or different levels of quality?Different levels of quality yes, unique/special items not from what I remember. 3) I hear it's very story driven...is it still enjoyable if you play for the level up/looting/character progressing aspect of the game?It is kinda but the story will make you forget about it + there will be lots of items and at a certain point after you upgrde your crew with powerful items you will sell all that you have without caring to the nearest shop. 4) Is it a good port? Runs well ect?Yep no problems here It's not that I have anything against story heavy RPG's...just not in the mood lately for them. It's either ME or Bioshock for $5 on steam, although I am not interested in Bioshock so much as I am completely burned out on FPS type games. If you have any other ideas let me know...even if it's an indie game or something.Thanks [/QUOTE]
Just a correction...ME is like $29 on steam, and bioshock is $5. I didn't mean to imply ME was $5 only Bioshock.Also, played TQ, NWN2, Witched, and some others already, but thanks for the suggestions.
Played vampire masquerade bloodlines?...if not play that instead of ME.
Can't stand Vampire...combat wasn't very good (imo) and the whole vampire setting isn't appealing to me. I am sure it is a treat for a lot of RPG players out there...just not my cup of tea.
all yes
I think Mass Effect is great. Better than The Witcher in my opinion.
1. yes definitely
2. don't really remember maybe someone else can fill in this gap
3. yes although they don't give you tons of opportunities to level up beyond the missions. Its pretty linear really. Not like diablo at all.
4. Excellent. very few problems for this day in age. It is stable for sure.
$5 is a great price. I was going to recommend Fallout 3 until I saw your price. Bioshock is much the same as Masseffect. Pretty linear and not much opportunity to power level. Both are more about the story. Mass Effect is probably closer but neither is like diablo. Hard to think of another $5 game. Might look at Mount and Blade. Its not a graphical wonder but its cheap, and totally a power leveling action rpg. Fallout 3 if you have more money would be good as well. There are also a lot of cheap diablo clones such as Dungeon Lords. Mass Effect Questions
I thought of a couple more recommendations that are better. You might look at the witcher, neverwinter nights, or titan quest for cheaper action rpgs like diablo.
Mass effect is very cinematic,feels like a movie sometimes,but its a crap crap crap game.Choices dont mean much..most of the planet surfaces are copy and paste jobs that would take no time at all to make...the story is mediocre...having sex with a blue aliens is always a plus though i guess...
[QUOTE=''dnuggs40'']Thinking of getting Mass Effect (ME) on steam but have a few questions just to make sure I will like it. I don't mind very heavy story driven RPG's but honestly I am just in the mood for some arpg type action (like diablo, ect). 1) Is there lots of meaningfull ways to customize your character with skills that have real gameplay changing effects? Other than the different cla$ses, nope. 2) Is there an item system where you can find special items or different levels of quality?Different levels of quality yes, unique/special items not from what I remember. 3) I hear it's very story driven...is it still enjoyable if you play for the level up/looting/character progressing aspect of the game?It is kinda but the story will make you forget about it + there will be lots of items and at a certain point after you upgrde your crew with powerful items you will sell all that you have without caring to the nearest shop. 4) Is it a good port? Runs well ect?Yep no problems here It's not that I have anything against story heavy RPG's...just not in the mood lately for them. It's either ME or Bioshock for $5 on steam, although I am not interested in Bioshock so much as I am completely burned out on FPS type games. If you have any other ideas let me know...even if it's an indie game or something.Thanks [/QUOTE]
Just a correction...ME is like $29 on steam, and bioshock is $5. I didn't mean to imply ME was $5 only Bioshock.Also, played TQ, NWN2, Witched, and some others already, but thanks for the suggestions.
Played vampire masquerade bloodlines?...if not play that instead of ME.
Can't stand Vampire...combat wasn't very good (imo) and the whole vampire setting isn't appealing to me. I am sure it is a treat for a lot of RPG players out there...just not my cup of tea.
all yes
I think Mass Effect is great. Better than The Witcher in my opinion.
Is ArmA: CO worth the $15?
Been eyeing this game for a couple of days now, and I prolly would've gotten it if it wasn't for the crappy reviews. I'd like to get some realistic feedback of how's the game like... It's been a while since release - any bugs fixed? Is the game in a better shape than it was when it came out? Is it really that brutally hard (compared to, let's say, America's Army or Full Spectrum Warrior difficulty)? How's the game overall? Multiplayer still alive by any chance?P.S. I'm not a geaphics fanatic, but is the game at least halfway decent-looking? I mean, we're not talking Delta Force graphics here, right?Is ArmA: CO worth the $15?
If you get ArmA, you need to get it and the expansion Queens Gambit.It is as hard as they say and really lacks with the singleplayer. I play it heavily modded online with people. Its the most realistic combat sim on the market with those mods. Is ArmA: CO worth the $15?
this game doesnt even worth my breakfast!
Don't listen to the guy above me. This game is really great, if you like military sims you'll love it. Multiplayer is very populated, just like it's spiritual predecessor Operation Flashpoint was. You also do not need Queen's Gambit expansion, not many servers force you to have it.
[QUOTE=''simardbrad'']Don't listen to the guy above me. This game is really great, if you like military sims you'll love it. Multiplayer is very populated, just like it's spiritual predecessor Operation Flashpoint was. You also do not need Queen's Gambit expansion, not many servers force you to have it.[/QUOTE]
military sims got realism and weapons handle different... however in arma...
I played the SP of the game, and it was absolutely boring. It's like they made operation flash point with better graphics, but with the same bugs.
Its horrible, i cant beilieve i wasted $15 on it... couldve gotten mount and blade :(
It's an excellent sim and well worth the money.
[QUOTE=''Renegade_Fury'']I played the SP of the game, and it was absolutely boring. It's like they made operation flash point with better graphics, but with the same bugs.[/QUOTE]
ask me sp was unplayable!black heads
If you get ArmA, you need to get it and the expansion Queens Gambit.It is as hard as they say and really lacks with the singleplayer. I play it heavily modded online with people. Its the most realistic combat sim on the market with those mods. Is ArmA: CO worth the $15?
this game doesnt even worth my breakfast!
Don't listen to the guy above me. This game is really great, if you like military sims you'll love it. Multiplayer is very populated, just like it's spiritual predecessor Operation Flashpoint was. You also do not need Queen's Gambit expansion, not many servers force you to have it.
[QUOTE=''simardbrad'']Don't listen to the guy above me. This game is really great, if you like military sims you'll love it. Multiplayer is very populated, just like it's spiritual predecessor Operation Flashpoint was. You also do not need Queen's Gambit expansion, not many servers force you to have it.[/QUOTE]
military sims got realism and weapons handle different... however in arma...
I played the SP of the game, and it was absolutely boring. It's like they made operation flash point with better graphics, but with the same bugs.
Its horrible, i cant beilieve i wasted $15 on it... couldve gotten mount and blade :(
It's an excellent sim and well worth the money.
[QUOTE=''Renegade_Fury'']I played the SP of the game, and it was absolutely boring. It's like they made operation flash point with better graphics, but with the same bugs.[/QUOTE]
ask me sp was unplayable!
Should I buy Far Cry 2 or COD 4?
Ive been waiting and waiting for COD4 to come down in price. Obviously it hasn't gone down much in a year. I also Just upgraded my video card and installed the demo again for COD 4. I'm more impressed and temped to buy it. Far Cry 2 is the same price so what should I buy? I like both linear and open world games, what do you guys think?Should I buy Far Cry 2 or COD 4?
[QUOTE=''gamerjerome'']Ive been waiting and waiting for COD4 to come down in price. Obviously it hasn't gone down much in a year. I also Just upgraded my video card and installed the demo again for COD 4. I'm more impressed and temped to buy it. Far Cry 2 is the same price so what should I buy? I like both linear and open world games, what do you guys think?[/QUOTE]Far Cry 2Should I buy Far Cry 2 or COD 4?
Get COD4 as i bought far cry 2 and it really sucks bad. I felt ripped off. COD4 on the other hand is a great game both singleplayer and multi.
If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game.
Cod 4 by far , Far Cry 2 will get old fast.
COD4 all the way!
[QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE]
How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them.
It totally kills immersion as does the fact everyone you meet fires on you instantly even if you work for their faction. Ok i know its opinion and you are entitled to yours i just can't understand anyone liking a game that is so repetive and should have been called far drive.
[QUOTE=''dannyw7982''][QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE]
How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them.
It totally kills immersion as does the fact everyone you meet fires on you instantly even if you work for their faction. Ok i know its opinion and you are entitled to yours i just can't understand anyone liking a game that is so repetive and should have been called far drive.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for you two cents, although I'm looking for answers that are a little more constructive. I assume your answer is COD4 then? Why?
COD 4 has a great multiplayer and a decent single player , while Far Cry has a somewhat decent single player and a horible multiplayer. I agree with dannyw7982
[QUOTE=''xAngels_Assasin'']COD 4 has a great multiplayer and a decent single player , while Far Cry has a somewhat decent single player and a horible multiplayer. I agree with dannyw7982[/QUOTE]
Thanks x. Between just single player campaigns what will have the most replay value? I'm so burnt out with online FPS. I have Crysis but the AI is kind of on the retarded side. Its some what a challenge when you have 15 Koreans shooting you at the same time but then your just playing hide cloak and seek.
NOT fc2. its fun but incredible repetitiveit should have been called far drive 2. i only have it cause it came with my gtx 260
[QUOTE=''dannyw7982''][QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE]
How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them.
It totally kills immersion as does the fact everyone you meet fires on you instantly even if you work for their faction. Ok i know its opinion and you are entitled to yours i just can't understand anyone liking a game that is so repetive and should have been called far drive.[/QUOTE]
Far Drive would be a good name.
The good thing about guard post respawning, for me, is the fact that i can try new ways to assault, and the respawning is reasonable, because, after all african women can't stop having children.. Haha.
COD4
[QUOTE=''dannyw7982''][QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE]
How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them.
[/QUOTE]
Im sorry, but THIS is your reason that CoD4 > FC2?
Have you SEEN the amount of respawing enemies that CoD4 has?
That said, If you HAVE to get one of them, I recommend CoD4. Although both are highly overrated game.
Get Crysis instead.
I'd go with Call of Duty 4, the single player is the one of the best (I might even rank it as number 1) single players experiences in an FPS that I have played. I also found the multiplayer very entertaining and one of the few multiplayer shooters that has kept me coming back for more. I can't really comment on Farcry 2 as I only played it for a few hours before I got bored (I don't really enjoy the open-ended games very much) and just so you know the multiplayer has an console style lobby/matchmaking system. I really hate using that system, that's one of the reasons I didn't try out multiplayer.
Get COD 4 NOW!, far cry 2 is a great game, but the SP and MP of COD 4 overshine far cry 2 by miles.
Don't listen to the folks saying FC 2 sucks. It simply doesn't. I personally hate COD games, but I know they are quite good. FC 2 is like Crysis. It's got great overall appearance and freedom, where COD is more focused on the shooting and gameplay. If your looking for an experience, get FC 2, but if you just want a straight foward, in your face shooter, get COD. You can't go wrong with either, just make sure you know what your'e buying.
[QUOTE=''gamerjerome''][QUOTE=''dannyw7982''][QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE] How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them. It totally kills immersion as does the fact everyone you meet fires on you instantly even if you work for their faction. Ok i know its opinion and you are entitled to yours i just can't understand anyone liking a game that is so repetive and should have been called far drive.[/QUOTE] Thanks for you two cents, although I'm looking for answers that are a little more constructive. I assume your answer is COD4 then? Why?[/QUOTE]
K a couple of quick reasons for me personally.
In COD4 single player there were moments that made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. It really is an awesome game and has well constructed levels and gameplay. My main problem is that the single player experience is a little short compared to some fps games.
In far cry 2 you get about 30 mins of ohhss and ahhs before you realise, WTF i left this area 2 minutes ago and its like i was never here as all the guys are back and the buildings rebuilt. Also most missions consist of drive here kill this then drive somewhere else kill that rinse and repeat.
And the driving parts are long and boring and consist of going through alot of magic respawning checkpoints.
Look just go for what you like the look of but imo far ry really was a let down, especially for a game i had so much hope for and had pre ordered.
CoD4 hands down (mainly for the multiplayer). If you liked the demo, there's really no doubt that you will enjoy the rest of the singleplayer.
[QUOTE=''dannyw7982'']Get COD4 as i bought far cry 2 and it really sucks bad. I felt ripped off. COD4 on the other hand is a great game both singleplayer and multi.[/QUOTE] no it didnt it was another free roam game ever played just cause?
[QUOTE=''gamerjerome'']Ive been waiting and waiting for COD4 to come down in price. Obviously it hasn't gone down much in a year. I also Just upgraded my video card and installed the demo again for COD 4. I'm more impressed and temped to buy it. Far Cry 2 is the same price so what should I buy? I like both linear and open world games, what do you guys think?[/QUOTE]Far Cry 2Should I buy Far Cry 2 or COD 4?
Get COD4 as i bought far cry 2 and it really sucks bad. I felt ripped off. COD4 on the other hand is a great game both singleplayer and multi.
If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game.
Cod 4 by far , Far Cry 2 will get old fast.
COD4 all the way!
[QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE]
How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them.
It totally kills immersion as does the fact everyone you meet fires on you instantly even if you work for their faction. Ok i know its opinion and you are entitled to yours i just can't understand anyone liking a game that is so repetive and should have been called far drive.
[QUOTE=''dannyw7982''][QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE]
How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them.
It totally kills immersion as does the fact everyone you meet fires on you instantly even if you work for their faction. Ok i know its opinion and you are entitled to yours i just can't understand anyone liking a game that is so repetive and should have been called far drive.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for you two cents, although I'm looking for answers that are a little more constructive. I assume your answer is COD4 then? Why?
COD 4 has a great multiplayer and a decent single player , while Far Cry has a somewhat decent single player and a horible multiplayer. I agree with dannyw7982
[QUOTE=''xAngels_Assasin'']COD 4 has a great multiplayer and a decent single player , while Far Cry has a somewhat decent single player and a horible multiplayer. I agree with dannyw7982[/QUOTE]
Thanks x. Between just single player campaigns what will have the most replay value? I'm so burnt out with online FPS. I have Crysis but the AI is kind of on the retarded side. Its some what a challenge when you have 15 Koreans shooting you at the same time but then your just playing hide cloak and seek.
NOT fc2. its fun but incredible repetitiveit should have been called far drive 2. i only have it cause it came with my gtx 260
[QUOTE=''dannyw7982''][QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE]
How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them.
It totally kills immersion as does the fact everyone you meet fires on you instantly even if you work for their faction. Ok i know its opinion and you are entitled to yours i just can't understand anyone liking a game that is so repetive and should have been called far drive.[/QUOTE]
Far Drive would be a good name.
The good thing about guard post respawning, for me, is the fact that i can try new ways to assault, and the respawning is reasonable, because, after all african women can't stop having children.. Haha.
COD4
[QUOTE=''dannyw7982''][QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE]
How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them.
[/QUOTE]
Im sorry, but THIS is your reason that CoD4 > FC2?
Have you SEEN the amount of respawing enemies that CoD4 has?
That said, If you HAVE to get one of them, I recommend CoD4. Although both are highly overrated game.
Get Crysis instead.
I'd go with Call of Duty 4, the single player is the one of the best (I might even rank it as number 1) single players experiences in an FPS that I have played. I also found the multiplayer very entertaining and one of the few multiplayer shooters that has kept me coming back for more. I can't really comment on Farcry 2 as I only played it for a few hours before I got bored (I don't really enjoy the open-ended games very much) and just so you know the multiplayer has an console style lobby/matchmaking system. I really hate using that system, that's one of the reasons I didn't try out multiplayer.
Get COD 4 NOW!, far cry 2 is a great game, but the SP and MP of COD 4 overshine far cry 2 by miles.
Don't listen to the folks saying FC 2 sucks. It simply doesn't. I personally hate COD games, but I know they are quite good. FC 2 is like Crysis. It's got great overall appearance and freedom, where COD is more focused on the shooting and gameplay. If your looking for an experience, get FC 2, but if you just want a straight foward, in your face shooter, get COD. You can't go wrong with either, just make sure you know what your'e buying.
[QUOTE=''gamerjerome''][QUOTE=''dannyw7982''][QUOTE=''rmfd341'']If you want a good multiplayer, you should get COD 4. Far Cry 2 also is a great gaming experience, the scenario and the guns are pretty good, the only thing that pisses me off, is the driving, and the guardposts, if you want to go anywhere, you got to be equipped, because you'll have to kill many people if your objective is on the other side of the country. But believe me, it's not a bad game. [/QUOTE] How can anyone call constantly and fast respawning guard posts a great gaming experience? Especially when you can't avoid them. It totally kills immersion as does the fact everyone you meet fires on you instantly even if you work for their faction. Ok i know its opinion and you are entitled to yours i just can't understand anyone liking a game that is so repetive and should have been called far drive.[/QUOTE] Thanks for you two cents, although I'm looking for answers that are a little more constructive. I assume your answer is COD4 then? Why?[/QUOTE]
K a couple of quick reasons for me personally.
In COD4 single player there were moments that made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. It really is an awesome game and has well constructed levels and gameplay. My main problem is that the single player experience is a little short compared to some fps games.
In far cry 2 you get about 30 mins of ohhss and ahhs before you realise, WTF i left this area 2 minutes ago and its like i was never here as all the guys are back and the buildings rebuilt. Also most missions consist of drive here kill this then drive somewhere else kill that rinse and repeat.
And the driving parts are long and boring and consist of going through alot of magic respawning checkpoints.
Look just go for what you like the look of but imo far ry really was a let down, especially for a game i had so much hope for and had pre ordered.
CoD4 hands down (mainly for the multiplayer). If you liked the demo, there's really no doubt that you will enjoy the rest of the singleplayer.
[QUOTE=''dannyw7982'']Get COD4 as i bought far cry 2 and it really sucks bad. I felt ripped off. COD4 on the other hand is a great game both singleplayer and multi.[/QUOTE] no it didnt it was another free roam game ever played just cause?
GTA IV - notebook supported?
Does GTA IV work with notebooks, by any chance? I mean, I will probably get one in like 6 months or so, and I want to play games on it...GTA IV - notebook supported?
Any games can work on a notebook aslong as it meets recommended requirements just like a desktop...GTA IV - notebook supported?
Notebooks are usually much more expensive than desktops even with equivalent hardware capabilities, something to keep in mind.
Any games can work on a notebook aslong as it meets recommended requirements just like a desktop...GTA IV - notebook supported?
Notebooks are usually much more expensive than desktops even with equivalent hardware capabilities, something to keep in mind.
oblivion with xpadder
i set up xpadder with 360 pad for oblivion fine i just cant do diagonal on the direction pad which i need for hot keys. anybody know how to do this? i suppose i can live without them but id prefer not tothanks ^_^ Bozzy-is-3^_^
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)